• Home
  • Our Team
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Gear Adrift
  • Sitemap

Call Us: 757.625.1192

Our Location
admin@ventkerlaw.com
Login

Login
Ventker Henderson, PLLC Ventker Henderson, PLLC
  • Home
  • Our Team
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Gear Adrift
  • Sitemap

Fair Game: Picking Low-Hanging Fruit to Get an Unfair Leg Up on the Competition May Leave Business Owners With a Mouth Full of Worms.

Aug 12, 2013 | Posted by Dave Ventker | Commercial Disputes, Small Businesses |

Danielle M. Kruer
In tough economic times, competition can be fierce. Be advised, however, that tactics your business uses to gain an advantage over a competitor may result in huge legal bills and damages claims if the competitor fights back in court, accusing you or your employees of competing unfairly.

A recent example of this is a case pending in The United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia. That court has recently refused to dismiss a lawsuit between competing businesses in the case of AWP, Inc. v. Commonwealth Excavating, Inc. et al., (Jul. 24, 2013). The court decided that plaintiff AWP has sufficiently stated claims for civil conspiracy, statutory business conspiracy, misappropriation of trade secrets, and tortious interference with contract. I write about this case not because it is a particularly novel or noteworthy opinion, but to the contrary, because it exemplifies the typical facts (with some interesting twists), in the type of business litigation that is becoming all too common in today’s economy.

Shawn Watkins was at one time employed as a regional manager by AWP. Using the experience and knowledge he gained there, Watkins left his job to pursue the American dream and set up his own business, doing the same work as AWP and competing for AWP’s customers. AWP threatened to sue Watkins, but a settlement was reached between them that required Watkins to shut down his new venture and to never again compete with AWP.

Not content with dodging a bullet and avoiding being sued by AWP (at least for the moment), Watkins allegedly approached another of AWP’s direct competitors, defendant Commonwealth Excavating, Inc., and agreed essentially to sell everything he knew about AWP to Commonwealth Excavating for the princely sum of $45,000. AWP, learning about this new relationship, filed suit against Commonwealth Excavating, Inc. and its president, Ira Biggs.

AWP has claimed there were meetings between Watkins and Commonwealth Excavating where Watkins agreed to disclose AWP’s confidential information and trade secrets to help Commonwealth Excavating underbid AWP and secure business from AWP’s former and current customers. This, AWP claims, is a business conspiracy in part because Commonwealth Excavating knew that Watkins had misappropriated the information from AWP. The court has agreed that the facts as alleged support such claims. The court also concluded the conspiracy claim, along with a separate claim for tortious interference with business relations, was supported by allegations that Watkins and Commonwealth Excavating had approached at least four of AWP’s former customers, and that AWP suffered loss of business and profits as well damage to its reputation and goodwill.

Further, the court applied the definitions of “trade secret” and “misappropriation” found in the Virginia Uniform Trade Secrets Act. It determined that AWP had sufficiently pled that the “identities of its customers, particular needs and issues of its customers, and protocols and methodologies” were trade secrets where AWP had taken “reasonable” steps to maintain their secrecy. “Misappropriation” was alleged to the effect that Commonwealth Excavating knowingly acquired the trade secrets from Watkins who was under an agreement not to compete with AWP, and also because he acquired this information while still employed by AWP.

Whether starting a new business, leaving to work for a new employer in your field, or looking to attract new customers to an existing business, this case demonstrates that there are limits to what is fair game. If the facts asserted in the lawsuit are proved to be true, then Mr. Watkins tried to use the knowledge he gained in his employment with AWP to start his own competing business, but found himself quickly threatened with litigation. In violation of an ancient legal doctrine, Watkins and Commonwealth Excavating are now accused of being “too cute by half,” as Watkins attempted to avoid his contractual obligations to AWP and profit accordingly. Commonwealth Excavating is facing potentially significant legal bills because it could not resist the opportunity to get a leg up on its competition. Our experience lately is that these claims are becoming more common. The business that gains an unfair advantage by hiring a competitor’s former employee, directly or otherwise, however, is more likely than ever before to find itself defending an expensive lawsuit as other businesses find themselves in a daily struggle to survive. 

© 2014 Ventker & Henderson, PLLC
ShareShare on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Email this to someone
email
Print this page
Print
0
Dave Ventker

About Dave Ventker

Managing Partner, Ventker Henderson, PLLC in Norfolk, Virginia. After 7 years on active duty with the Navy, Dave has spent more than 25 years in private practice, primarily defending admiralty and commercial disputes, with a healthy amount of time advising business clients how to avoid getting dragged in to court at the outset.

Leave a Reply

Your email is safe with us.
Cancel Reply

Recent Posts

  • A Conversation About Partnership July 25, 2019
  • Arbitration of Jones Act Injury Claims June 3, 2019
  • Marissa Henderson Presents in New Orleans April 26, 2019
  • The Wave of the Future: Vessels Controlled By a Joystick July 10, 2018
  • Dave Ventker Chosen as Top 100 Lawyer in Virginia by Super Lawyers Magazine May 14, 2018

Archives

  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • April 2019
  • July 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • October 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • December 2015
  • September 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • September 2014
  • May 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013

Categories

  • Admiralty and Maritime
  • Commercial Disputes
  • Employment Law
  • Federal Courts
  • Federal Jurisdiction
  • Marine Insurance
  • News
  • Random Thoughts
  • Removal of Maritime Claims
  • Small Businesses
  • Subject Matter Jurisdiction
  • Uncategorized
  • Updates
  • Women-Owned Businesses

Contact Us

Send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Send Message
Experienced lawyers with a unique approach - we actually listen to our clients.

Who Are We?

Ventker Henderson, PLLC is a Virginia Professional Limited Liability Company. We are also a Certified Veteran-Owned Small Business.

Contact Info

  • Ventker Henderson, PLLC
  • 256 West Freemason Street, Norfolk, VA 23510
  • +1 757.625.1192
  • +1 757.625.1475
  • admin@ventkerlaw.com
  • https://www.ventkerlaw.com

Fresh from our blog

  • A Conversation About Partnership July 25, 2019
  • Arbitration of Jones Act Injury Claims June 3, 2019
  • Marissa Henderson Presents in New Orleans April 26, 2019
  • The Wave of the Future: Vessels Controlled By a Joystick July 10, 2018
  • Dave Ventker Chosen as Top 100 Lawyer in Virginia by Super Lawyers Magazine May 14, 2018
  • Dave Ventker Speaks to Docking Pilots on Liability Issues April 30, 2018

Where we practice

We are physically located in Norfolk, Virginia, which is just minutes from North Carolina. We are licensed in both states and spend nearly as much time in coastal North Carolina as in Virginia.

© 2017 Ventker Henderson, PLLC

  • Home
  • Our Team
  • About
  • Contact
  • Gear Adrift
  • Sitemap
Prev Next